Autor: eucivicism

Assuming the Sale

Let me go all Scott Adams on you here.

Behold the magnificence:


I am in no way knowledgable about Norte Americano politics. How did this meeting come about? Most likely on Peña’s initiative, I assume, since it’s his turf. Did he want to get a feel for the man that might have him facing a forced return of millions of his countrymen to Mexico? Is he looking for an ally against his enemy Slim? Could there be internal Mexican reasons, a slump in his overall public appeal, or some scandal he wants to draw attention away from? I do not know. Perhaps the reasons are historico-military: as much of a sweet deal it was to unload millions of your unwashed northwards thanks to the spinelessness of a converged-Washington, Peña fears the resurgence of American strength and has no appetite for open hostility. Wer weiß.

But look at the above picture. Trump, not yet in office, doesn’t have the stars and stripes behind him, but to the id this is irrelevant. Two big men, leaders (powerful men, I tell you) are seeing eye to eye here, addressing their subjects, allies and enemies through an army of journalists hanging on their every word.

The subconscious message is clear: Trump is king already, meeting and negotiating with heads of state who listen to and respect him. His inauguration election in November is a mere formality.

If you’ve ever wondered how a revolutionarily republican, regicidal, equalitarian, demotist France could promptly rationalize the elevation of her first generalissimo as empereur, this is how. The outside trappings of republican ideology and manifestos were inconsequential when put against Bonaparte’s archetypal gravitas. He was what he was, whether it was in line with your principles or not.

And so it is with Donald I. The black pill at this point is of course in pointing out the dominance of coalition-of-the-fringes style vote bloc packing ever since having been summoned by FDR . Against the forces of Mordor, there can be no victory.

But while we’re at the subject of summoning, do not underestimate the unseen forces accessible to the right. The left’s unholy melange of dindu voodoo, aztec blood sacrifice and  femi-blob unfertility rituals isn’t the only game in town anymore.

Long live the Amphibian Revolution. Praise Kek

The High and the Low

The Nrx critique of the alt-right:

You are deluded activists, believing in the power of mass action. You are demotists (i.e. liberals), and as such the difference between you and the left is merely cosmetic. You are pawns with no understanding of the nature of power. Swept this way one day, and that way the next, you are hopeless to ever get in the driver’s seat.

The alt-right critique of Nrx:  

You are secretive, inconsequential quasi-occultists, who are big on critique but short on deliverables. You might be smart, but have no roadmap or instructions to provide your lessers with („becoming worthy“ is laughable and doesn’t count, you spergy clown).


I have some academic interest in where the boundaries between the two are ultimately going to lie. It’s secondary though to the restoring of sane management to Western polities.  In the end I wonder where this whole stand-off is coming from in the first place, because I imagine the most likely (success) scenario to look something like this:

  • Some lesser power center, either within or outside the Cathedral, desires to increase its position. This could be anyone from a CEO (or group thereof), billionaires (or a group thereof), media players, military leadership, religious leadership, heads of states, bureaucrats, secret services, to some university or faculty wishing for the same clout Harvard has now.
  • They see the masses stirring with discontent at globalism, and the Cathedral beating them down, arresting their leadership and destroying them memetically. If they join the Cathedral in doing so, they play it safe, but stand little chance to grow their power. It is more of a downward insurance. As more players pile in, engaging in holiness-signalling yields diminishing returns.
  • Someone less risk-averse comes along and sees in his mind the possibility of gaining immensely (or losing it all if things turn sour) by defecting and counter-signalling the Cathedral narrative.  But his case needs to be watertight; he knows the alt-right masses are being destroyed memetically, their memes having no effect on Cathedral brahmins.
  • This is where the Nrx corpus (whatever it will be at this point) comes in. Here is a memeplex that lets you win at boardroom meetings, securing promotions and tenures, and makes you look smart when put next to holiness-spouting Cathedral brahmins. It is where the Chicago Boys meet Pinochet, Luther meets the Duke of Saxony, the Ford Foundation meets Civil Rights etc.

Because the target demographics of the alt-right and NRx differ (one low to middle, the other high) so must their memetics. Now it’s perfectly possible that Nrx is going to morph into something different entirely. But that wouldn’t change the fundamental high-low dynamics, and merely require some other high-aimed memeplex to fulfill its role in restoring sane management to the West.


Compatriots as Welshmen



  1. foreign, non-Germanic (Celtic, later also Roman)


The appearance of a shared language betrays the fact that we are as foreigners unto each other. Many ways to talk about the commons, but wide gaps in vocab and psychology.

What are the commons?

Equality -> high time preference, resource centered. Women, children, paupers, low status males, minorities, even the impoverished low nobility need resources and status now; not tomorrow or next year. Coalition of the fringes.

Freedom -> medium time preference, production/exchange centered. Patricians, guildsmen, businessmen, industrialists, the middle class need access to markets and opportunities to produce into the foreseeable future. Let capital go where it will.

Order -> low time preference, dynastically centered. Patriarchs, the officer corps, landed nobles, the enfranchised, those with skin in the game want stable conditions to see their families/investments flourish into the future. Immediate security is a concern of course, just not the whole of the story. Je maintiendrai.

Towards an exchange based government

Look a which values dominate modern discourse. Non-discrimination, integration, anti-racism, feminism -> equality. Political modernity, far from being an enlightened exchange between the castes, is nothing but the elevation of low-class needs and wants at the expense and demonization of middle and upper class strategies (free speech = hate speech; capitalism = heartlessness; eugenics = white privilege; masculinity = toxic; meritocracy = oppression; etc.).

If this seems infantile, that is a feature not a bug, as it is the language of the temperamentally child-like. It is not meant to satisfy adult or responsible sensibilities, but to rally the low and shame the high.

The first steps in another language are always awkward, though perhaps also the most fun. So excuse my clumsiness as I dabble my way into propertarian thinking. To complicate things further, my instincts tell me to think of a nation as basically a large, aligned tribe (silly Teuton me), so working out all these caste dependenices comes very counterintuitively.

Still, the alt-right needs positives to work towards; no shortage of witty and hilarous commentary on the flaws of modernity, but a bad need of visions for the future.

Colognian Reaction

A Protestant Colognian, a Prussian Rhinelander. I am that walking contradiction. Because I am Protestant, I meet up every two to three weeks with a friar at St. Andreas and go through a kind of informal Catholic catechesis. Because I am Lutheran, I never go to Lutheran mass but much prefer the Orthodox service at the Saints Constantine and Helena chapel (though rarely taking in its full three hours). Because of my Christianity, my sympathy for the old gods.

Because I studied economics and then worked in consulting, I am now studying engineering to work in a technical function. A conscientious objector at 18, I now find myself an ardent militarist. There is no coherence or constancy in any of this, other than the inner voice that keeps on asking „what must I do?“ (h/t Doolittle). All in all, not too untypical for a German.

Neoreaction,  Heroic reaction, the alt- and mil-right are right now going through the pangs of differentiating themselves from each other. Very well, let a thousand ideologies bloom. What will be my garden to tend? Hrx seems like a promising proposition, though the evolving school of Doolittleian propertarianism cannot have captivated me for so long without reason.

For better or worse, this town of mine has become a salient point within the current dyscivic crisis. Liberalism has visited the entirety of its unsavory arsenal upon Cologne: once a patrician city state full of guilds, faith and trade, boasting one of the largest medieval fortifications in Europe, benign emperors watching from afar, the French mob army came and wiped all of that away. Because equality. Now the third world mob has descended on us to consume whatever commons are left. Because human rights. As the moozy orda rages outside the feminist eunuch lectures critical theory to infertile, gay student bodies, though they do have two cats.

Eucivicism was moral rage against social parasitism; perhaps Colognian reaction will be something different. In everything, the firm belief that the internet will foment a disruption to liberal dyscivics the likes of which we have never seen. Whatever our role, let it be fulfilled.

Wenn et Trömmelche steiht

Sollte die Session aufgrund eines Terrorverdachts abgesagt/stark militarisiert werden, profitierte das Regime in zweierlei Hinsicht:

Unmilitarisiert können öffentliche Festivitäten wie der Fastelovend unter dem Drittweltbesatzungsregime ohnehin nicht mehr stattfinden. Massenhafte afro-mohammedanische Übergiffe wären als Automatismen gegeben. Zudem bestünde die Gefahr, identitär-solidarische Sentimente unter der weißen Bevölkerung aufkeimen zu lassen. Man stelle sich die Transformation einer von außen belagerten Kappensitzung, plötzlich die eigene Sicherheit und taktische Situation debattierend, in eine quasi revolutionäre Kommune vor; oder die eines Karnevalsregiments, umringt von Aggression und Chaos, von einer polemisch-spöttelnden in eine proper-miltärische Einheit innerhalb von Momenten.

Die Militarisierung/Absage löste, zumindest kurzfristig, das Problem braun-männlicher Übergriffe auf weiße Frauen (welches zunächst der weiße Feminismus in den Augen der Öffentlichkeit gewonnen hat, obwohl die Drittweltapologetik zweifelsfrei nicht lange ihre Wunden lecken wird). Zweitens würde der Organisation einer weißen Selbstverteidigung der Riegel vorgeschoben („die Beamten tun ihr Möglichstes“).


Die stärkste Option des Regimes scheint die Absage des Fastelovends (ganz unabhängig von der Substanz etwaiger Terrorverdachte), oder alternativ ein starkt militarisiertes Stattfinden zu sein. Keine weiteren Bilder braun-weißer Betatschungen, und kein Risiko der Organisation einer weißen Selbstverteidigung sind lohnende kurzfristige Ziele. Allerdings: keiner weiß, was mittelfristig passiert, wenn et Trömmelche nit jeiht. Nicht dass Spieltheorie und Entscheidungspfadarchitektur zu den Stärken der greisen Ideologen, die uns regieren, gehörten.

Christening the Enemy

Who is the enemy? Identification is easily done:

  • The Frankfurt School
  • Banksters
  • Communists
  • Socialists
  • Grievance group advocates, I.e. community organizers/social workers
  • Multikultists
  • Antifa/europhobics
  • R-selected
  • Commons-consuming parasites, I.e third worlders
  • Fragilistas
  • Heretics
  • Progressives
  • Feminists
  • Gutmenschen/ bien-pensants
  • Traitors
  • Dyscivicists
  • Cucks (ethno-masochists)
  • Cuckservatives (blank slatists/propositionalists)
  • Low trust /high time preference people
  • Liars/Sophists
  • SJWs
  • Mohammedans
  • Pharisees/moralists/hypocrites
  • Soros / state department (destructive meddlers in European societies)

An easily compiled list, but much too mosaic to be of rethorical use. There are certain options for clustering (communists/keynesians/welfarists -> statists; central bankers/immigrationists -> fragilistas), but these don’t encapsulate the entirety of the enemy spectrum.

Enter Globalism

The globalist identification provides two main advantages: 1. A big enough tent to fit the breadth of the enemy alliance 2. A call of urgency vis-a-vis the most pressing matter, demographic replacement of the northern hemispherals (which forms the base of the alt-right’s Pavlovian pyramid. Without our people, low taxes don’t matter) -> the nationalist-globalist conflict

That is why the Eucivic institute wholeheartedly embraces the globalist moniker. Do not expect our enemies to pick it up themselves – it is an exo- rather than an endonym (much like the Mohammedan[exo]/Muslim [endo]markers). If, in a misplaced flight of ‚embrace the insult‘, they do, rejoice: it will be but another instance of the self-compiling ostracon.

The Ostracon is writing itself


Being from one of the subjugated peoples at the periphery of the American Empire comes with its perks and drawbacks. We are famously cursed with cucky leaders who love to bend over at Washington’s beck and call: vibrancy by way of NATO, neocon wars that have a funny tendency to end up pro-dar-al-islam, and a religious adherence to whatever new social justice doctrine the fine folks at Berkeley and Massachusetts have come up with.

On the plus side, we are blessed with a level of nationalism and ethnic identity that would make most SWPL Americans‘ heads explode. For example, early last year (pre-Pegida days), I was looking for apartments in Dresden. Upon hearing my clearly non-local accent the real estate agent pointed out that the neighborhood thankfully neither had any negroes or moslems, like they do in the West. I acknowledged his point. Nota bene that this exchange occured without any of the code words I understand are used for this in the US (good schools, quiet neighborhood, etc.).

I am agnostic however about the most heavily touted difference between Reichsamerikaner and EU peripherals, namely second amendment gun rights. It’s true that Americans have an easier time obtaining hand guns, but how does this compare to actual modern infantry equipment?

In either case, I believe that the Trumpening is an unmistakable sign that nationalist Europeans and Americans are converging.  Different though we are, this conflict will make us brothers. And our enemies, feeling the heat, can’t help but double-down on their own sanctimoniousness.


„… just a survivor’s sharp sense of power  and a scientist’s devotion to data“

Top kek, much lel. Were her age (61) and body mass index (your guess is as good as mine, but she seems to be packing a couple of extra pounds)  less forbidding, we could be looking forward to the certainty of seeing her chickens coming home to roost. Will she feel a true survivor and scientist when the noose tightens around her neck? Unfortunately, time is probably on her side in dodging the coming Eucivic punishment against traitors to the European völkerfamilie (2025? 30? Spieglein, Spieglein an der Wand).

And so, as their outside enemies are failing to be affected by the old spells, the globalists approach the final stage of their life cycle. Reality by chanting is failing them, and dementia appears more and more attractive. Averting their eyes from that unsufferable, serotonin-dropping look at grim reality they descent into self-worship, as they style themselves larger-than-life avatars of their fading ideology.

Thus the globalist catalogue by which future Westerners will punish is compiled by the ostracees. The ostracon is writing itself.



Carthago delenda, aut reformanda erat?

Ensconced in an inter-civilizational brawl, the West would have long fought back were it not for a serious problem: no one seems to be able to remember exactly what Cato the Elder recommended be done with Carthage. Were the Punics to be re-educated and integrated into the Roman proposition empire? Were radical Baalist elements to be killed, the Barcids to be replaced with a more agreeable dynasty? How is the West to deal with a civilizational challenge from across the Mediterranean?

While the search for the DICTVM CATONIS MAIORIS continues, two competitors step up to fill the void.

The Contenders:

Hailing from the Middle Kingdom, give a warm welcome to the Breaker of Mahometanism, Reactionary Expat:

Next up, a libertarian tag team absolutely willing to break the NAP in delivering their punches. Give it up for the Reapers of PC, Bill Whittle & Stefan Molyneux:


Expat delivers the dispassionate, ice-cold analysis that brings together all the best qualities of the alt-right. Civilizational scope, without ideological blinds, uncucked and un-apologetical, one would be forgiven to detect slight signs of bromance on my part (amused mastery!), were the Eucivic Institute not a bastion of objective scientody (ahem). 10/10, would watch again.

Whittle-Molyneux have set the bar high with this recent, excellent r/K discussion. Sadly, in this bout for the title of PSEVDO-CATO, they end up short. While putting up a fight, they get dangerously close to cucky proposition nation territory, and suffer for it.

Is the ideological dimension of the fight important? Yes, it is. Does the future of the West depend on inducing a reformation like movement within Mohammedanism? No, it doesn’t. Expelling the barbarians is sufficient.

It’s like we’re watching the birth pangs of a national libertarianism. Exactly which Mohammedan explosion broke their water is an academic question (9.11, 11-M, 11.17, it doesn’t really matter), but Whittle & Molyneux are seemingly in labour.

The child hasn’t been delivered yet, though. „We have to kill the radicals, it’s like beating Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan“, yes yes,“America is in a much better position because of our clearly defined values as opposed to, say, Sweden“. Push harder!, my inner midwife wants to scream. The reason Sweden is so cucked is because they insisted on pretending to be nothing but values, and ostracising anyone who dares object. If magic dirt theory were correct, Sweden (any European country, for that matter) would have continued to be a peaceful, middle class, welfare paradise regardless of its ethnic composition. Alas, reality.

The most important rhetorical takeaway seems to be the analogy between National Socialism and Mohammedanism; input for the next coprop sparring session.

The Verdict:

Expat wins this, hands down.  His nonchalant analysis benefits first and foremost by taking the wider geo-political picture into account: Mohammedanism, benefitting from a 90s birth bulge, is running out of steam. Defeating Europe (improbable) is the last chance it really has, and even if succesful, it won’t be able to take on third civilizations like the East Asians or Latin Americans.

All Europe has to do is getting our act together and remove the occupying forces (medium difficulty), not engaging in inception-like psy-ops to stop Mohammedan autophagy or make it compatible with the West (hard to impossible difficulty). HABEMVS PSEVDO-CATONEM!

Salvaging the proposition nation, culinary style

It’s all but clear that endo-Hajnalians are more susceptible to ideological heresy and do not default to ethno-nationalism the way much of the rest of the world does. I think this observation will be common knowledge among future generations, and that, hence, they will not look back on this first half of the 21st century with disbelief at our utter stupidity or incomprehension for our autogenocidal tendencies.

Rather, the history of our times will illustrate the need for an endo-Hajnalian (which is really just another way of saying European+k-selected) memetic immunology. Future inquisitors are going to study closely the events unfolding as we speak. Ultimately, our ugly dyscivic present will have served its purpose as the petri dish that spawned the antibodies to prevent future infections. VACCINVM EVCIVICVM, the k-selects‘ philosopher’s stone.

One segment of this vaccine will be an awareness for our need for ideology. Ask yourself why you are spending time reading at the Eucivic Institute, or other alt-right blogs; why the devout listen to sermons (regardless of Christian, Churchian, Mohammedan etc.), the commuter puts an hour+ daily into reading his New York Times or Le Figaro, or the r-select switches channels for the evening news when he could be absorbing another episode of the Kardashians. All of these go beyond mere entertainment or passing the time, and constitute voluntary as opposed to institutionally required ideological exposure as happens in the military or academia. I understand there is a modicum of fascination among some anglophones for the trigger happy word agglutination of my native language, and present these fine gentlemen with Weltanschauungsbedürfnis.

The proposition nation serviced this bedürfnisbut it went too far in that it took the natus ex natione, and denied the biological reality of the nation as a reproductive community. There are limits to this of course. Few people would accept some agency worker knocking at their door, presenting them with a perfect stranger, say, a Middle Eastern refugee, and commanding them to take him in as if he were part of their nuclear family. „But he’s not“, says the neurotypical person and slams the door shut in the parasite distributor’s face.

Zoom out a bit further to the municipal level though, and you have people nodding in agreement that indeed, diversity is their strength (not a strength, or one strength, but their strength). „Ich ben Grieche, Türke, Jude/Moslem un Bhuddist“, sings the cucky Colognian 68er during carnival, a traditional festival so deeply catholic and localist in nature it would make an identitarian cry tears of joy. Zoom out further, and you get the American cuck believing the 18th century quasi-Aristocrats (k-selects in any case) penning the constitution had Aztecs and Somalis in mind as much as their own Anglo posterity.

Knowing that some foods, such as chocolate bars or frappuccinos, have sub-optimal nutritional value should not cause you to forswear eating and die of starvation. Rather, it should have you watch your diet.  And so it is with ideology. As much as the body won’t support zero nutritional intake, so the mind won’t support memetic starvation. That is why the Eucivicist of the future will look back on our times as we look on a herd of obesettes stuffing their faces with junk food: not with disbelief or incomprehension, for we know that caloric intake is a metabolic necessity. But with disgust, for their diet (and possibly, table manners) is gross.

It’s the same thing, really

In this, memetics agrees with cuisine: you are what you eat. Time for aesthetically offended Eucivic chefs to grincer les dents, step forth and bitchslap that donut out of Europa’s sputtering mouth. And, while we’re at it, burn down the donut, muffin and frappuccino places she used to get her fixes from.

Coprop Sparring Session I

Mohammedan attacks like yesterday’s Paris bombing bring salience to the ongoing colonization and subversion of Europe made possible by traitorous elites. Excellent opportunities present themselves for spreading memes of counterpropaganda. Retorts are divided into rhetoric and dialectics, to be applied depending on the mental capacities of the recipient.


  • „Muslims are a part of Europe“

R: No. Muslims are parasites to Europeans.

D: No. The Middle East is Muslim, would you call it European?

  • „Die Flüchtlinge wollen hier Steuern zahlen“

R: That’s laudable. Even better, let’s meet them halfway and grant them tax relief until they can afford return tickets.

D: Their financial contributions do not outweigh the bio-civilizational damage caused by their presence.

  • „Muslims/Refugees are human beings, too“

D: Taxonomical classification within the homo genus does not confer a right to parasitism or residence.

R: Right, which is why we can’t turn them into cattle food like we would with bad produce. Repatriate them humanely.

  • „Europa hat eine besondere Verantwortung Aufgrund seiner Geschichte“

D: Zivilisation ist die einzige Moral. Der Import afro-mohammedanischen Auswurfes nach Europa ist ein Verbrechen ersten Ranges.

R: No. Cucks like you have a special hatred of healthy people because of your mental problems.


Of course, sensitivity is advised. The more cynical or obviously traitorous the recipient, the less words should be minced. Towards the more emotionally stirred (and especially so with women), care should be taken to not force these talking points or deliver them too crassly, so as not to make the eucivic position seem unfeeling.